xymphora - Latest Comments in Apologies for Evil

Re: Apologies for Evil

GregoryBacon — Fri, 22 May 2009 06:17:43 -0000

"There's no business like SHOAH™ business and SHOAH™ is like no business I know."

Now hand over some more money or else you'll be charged with violating the "Hate Crimes Act," specifically the Abe Fartman section.

Re: Apologies for Evil

lobro — Thu, 21 May 2009 16:42:55 -0000

i guess we share the humorous sense of morbidity, laurie

Re: Apologies for Evil

KAKUSA — Thu, 21 May 2009 15:08:30 -0000

We the American people are NOT Israel’s BITCH… Obama, Congress and the Media are!

F**K Israel
Israel is NO Friend to America or the World..!!

Congressional members with dual American / Israeli Citizenships are TRAITORS, they need to be lined up against a wall and SHOT…!!

Israel / Zionist Jews are the Blood Sucking Parasites of the World. They are nothing more then Leeches feeding on Humanity and sucking the life out of Mankind.
The sooner this World is rid of them the better we all will be.

“What’s the difference between an Israeli and a Catfish”?
One’s a Scum Sucking Bottom Feeder and the other is a Fish”

"Die You Scum Bastards, Die"

Re: Apologies for Evil

D Freeman — Thu, 21 May 2009 13:54:06 -0000

Dick Cheney is a pure bred psychopath he was born this way and has no empathy for anyone not even for those in Israel he sees power as his right he was Bushes master handler what ever but it was all Dick and why because he is what you see evil. The more people stand up for him the more he will lead them in to the dark. Obama has to deal with the booby traps that the Bush member set in place ready for the next Bush to take over I think they have a idea that Jeb should be the next war criminal . They are all members of this New World Order and can not understand why those that they wish to have control over all round the world is putting up a fight and do not want to be slaves to them. If Israel was supposed to be there then it would have been okay the more blood they spill the more trouble they will bring to themselves. There is many psychopaths in Govenment its the place they get put and used by those who do not want to be seen to be the real voice behind the problem Cheney can not shut up he has run the USA for a long time now he is nothing. A man like him plays with evil and thinks he has total control but when the Devil comes for pay he will be made to pay there is to many dead not at rest because of men like him. And the USA has to stop believing in these mad men.

Re: Apologies for Evil

lobro — Thu, 21 May 2009 12:26:57 -0000

nowhere to hide (noahide for short) or membership in the Coalition of Useful Idiots has DOWNsides (as in Down syndrome):
LONDON (Reuters) – Britain risks losing its precious triple-A credit rating because of the danger that government debt may soar close to 100 percent of GDP

of course, THE jew is not complaining that a faithful goy nation works around the clock in agroprocessors facility with no take home pay, THE jew keeps all, goys can eat scraps of intestines off the slaughterhouse floor.

Re: Apologies for Evil

greg — Thu, 21 May 2009 11:54:24 -0000

The meeting at the White House must have been a failure for Israel since there has been so little reporting on it.

Re: Apologies for Evil

Laurie — Wed, 20 May 2009 19:30:06 -0000

LOL, HEEHEE, LOL

Re: Apologies for Evil

lobro — Wed, 20 May 2009 19:02:56 -0000

i am not kidding, not that i am a jew-lit expert but that one gets my gastric juices flowing, purging forwards and backwards until attaining the complete void, the state of oneness with cosmic yad vashem.

Re: Apologies for Evil

lobro — Wed, 20 May 2009 17:32:06 -0000

nothing much to say, flatlining while meditating on the ETERNAL MEMORY OF SHOAH, pitiful rows upon the rows of SHOES (rhymes with SHOAHs, that's the whole point, get it, can't replace shoes with bras or something), like counting SHEEP (almost rhymes with SHOAH) before SLEEP (rhymes with SHEEP, so we're getting there, back to SHOAH).

so when i say shoah induces sleep, there is nothing anti-semitic there, ok?

and if you find me snoring soulfully with a book opened across my face, it will be while reading the all-time, all-star favorite passage:
Left in Dark Times, then, is a meditation on the soul of the left, bursting at its margins with nostalgia for a left that never lived up to its ideals. One particularly notable section is Lévy’s deconstruction of anti-Semitism, which the New York Times Book Review’s Sam Tanenhaus called a most elegant summary.

notwithstanding that jew praises jew for his writing about jew, bern-ard-hen-ri-le-vy is one soulful dude, just check out that face.

Re: Apologies for Evil

LudolfVieken — Wed, 20 May 2009 09:31:57 -0000

not ignored, great, xenophile found it, -- the saga of the French comedian is making the rounds (iraq-war.ru, wakeupfromyourslumber )
Fight Fire with Humor - French comedian faces off against Zionists
...Dieudonne who, in the past, had always enjoyed ridiculing pretty much every segment of French society clearly had never expected the hysterical uproar that his humor would trigger that day: the huge constellation of French Zionists organizations lead by the notorious CRIF ("Representative Committee of Jewish organization in France" - the French version of AIPAC) immediately attacked Dieudonne, suing him for racists comments and suing him for "anti-Semitism" (a criminal offense in France). This was hardly the first time that the French Zionist mob had decided to crush an outspoken critic of its role in French politics or its unconditional support for the last racist state on the planet: Israel. But this time, the Ziomob miscalculated, badly.
Dieudonne began making the accusations of anti-Semitism made against him a central piece of his shows. Here is a sampling of the kind of the hilarious skits Dieudonne came up with:
http://vineyardsaker.blogsp...

and to another comment already posted (from iraq-warru this time)
Israel bans books, music and clothes from entering Gaza
By Amira Hass
The few items merchants are allowed to trade in are divided into three categories: food, medicine and detergent. Everything else is forbidden - including building materials (which are necessary to rehabilitate Gaza's ruins and rebuild its infrastructure), electric appliances such as refrigerators and washing machines, spare machine and car parts, fabrics, threads, needles, light bulbs, candles, matches, books, musical instruments, crayons, clothing, shoes, mattresses, sheets, blankets, cutlery, crockery, cups, glasses and animals. Many of the banned products are imported through the tunnels and can be found in Gaza's markets.
http://www.effedieffe.com/c...

Re: Apologies for Evil

LudolfVieken — Wed, 20 May 2009 09:28:53 -0000

not ignored, -- but sorry for double posting, - now have edited it away

Re: Apologies for Evil

kei&yuri — Wed, 20 May 2009 01:46:30 -0000

They were hardly mirror images.
Markoff was the standard Jewish ripper nightmare -- privilege literally preying on multiple vulnerable sex workers and then trying to use family connections to escape. Key thing is multiple victims: cold blood, planning, rotation with "normal life," a hobby which could've gone on forever.
Morgan was an idiot with a bad crush on one (1) girl and a severe failure of parenting and education.
(Personally it took us years to figure out stuff about rejection and basic relationships, and now we're amazed this stuff isn't regularly taught, especially since a lot of what we've learned comes in part from books on Not Being a Dick which lend themselves easily to teaching, lots of Virginia Satyr and Bandler & Grinder and psychology stuff. How many crazy people just didn't get to the moral introspective informal course described and were stuck brooding and brooding on a simple problem of framing until they did something everyone regrets and nobody prevented?)

Re: Apologies for Evil

lobro — Wed, 20 May 2009 01:18:24 -0000

asserting holocaust is hate crime (and i hate crime), should be punishable by 2000 lashes in singapore, more added every time the whippee stops chewing gum.

Re: Apologies for Evil

musings — Tue, 19 May 2009 23:17:52 -0000

I left this too vague - Markoff is exactly as Jewish as was the young woman murdered by Morgan - that is both of their fathers are Jewish. But those who brought up Markoff the murderer's affiliation were said to be dealing in antisemitic slurs. I think this is something worth discussing, as the two New England murders happened within a couple weeks of each other. Of course I suppose the point is that Morgan believed the girl to be Jewish and that is why he had to kill her. Is it? Or was he going to find another "reason"? Whereas Markoff robbed prostitutes and he killed the woman who fought back. But he preyed only on prostitutes, making him therefore discriminatory against sex trade workers. Are both men guilty of prejudice? Or of murder. I would say that prejudice is a lesser offense. But perhaps when the killings occurred both men thought that by killing someone of lower status they could .... my imagination fails me. It's just men killing women. So what else is new in this nasty old world? Put whatever label you want on it. It is exploitation and plain old murder.

Re: Apologies for Evil

musings — Tue, 19 May 2009 22:57:48 -0000

I assume you are referring to Stephen Morgan of the North Shore of Boston, who murdered a woman he met in a summer school at NYU two years before, while she worked at a bookstore in Middletown, Ct. Very sad for the girl. But sadder still was to use her death as another excuse to whip a community into panic while the young man was at large. He is just some obsessive stalker who experienced a "failure to launch" in adolescence. Sent to a boys' Catholic high school, where he was not particularly successful or popular (although handsome), he joined the Navy where he served without incident for four years. He then tried to hit on the young woman who was the child of a Jew and a non-Jew. They found his "diary" you see, with some anti-semitic remarks in it, perhaps because the gal used her Jewish associations to try and dump him back when they knew each other. This was used as I said to whip up popular frenzy when the police found said diary left conveniently in his car (when will those psychos ever learn - don't put it in writing!) In the ridiculous atmosphere, it is once again impossible to talk about stalkers who kill because nobody really was focusing on that aspect, only on the threat to Jews. In that sense, the young woman was exploited as hell as well as stalked, poor thing. As for the Navy interlude, one of his acquaintances, a Jewish shipmate, came forward and indicated that there was something between them and maybe that was where the antisemitism started, not with the girl. Some kind of homoerotic tension in their lives. It makes sense, because the class Morgan met the girl in was about sexual identity. And I think it is also likely that the girl was ambivalent about her orientation too. But the media did not explore the sexual orientation side or some man's disappointment that the object of his obsession was perhaps uninterested in him because he was male. I find this all quite interesting because for the purpose of the storyline, the female victim is assumed by most to be Jewish, while nearby in Boston, a young medical student who shot a prostitute in a very similar way to how Morgan killed the bookstore person, point-blank, is, though named Markoff and also possibly characterizable as Jewish - well that angle does not come up. It's an interesting juxtaposition. Two young murderers of females, like mirror images of each other. One however is "worse" than the other? Not the one I am supposed to think is worse, however. I am not saying this to heap anything on any ethnic group, merely to point out how the media shapes our biases. You have only to read comments after any news story to see that generally the mob is being herded quite well. My final verdict? I'm thinking Philip Markoff is a common criminal with typical sociopathic tendencies. I'm thinking Stephen Morgan is mad. It is interesting that Morgan turned himself in, but Markoff had to be arrested.

Re: Apologies for Evil

LudolfVieken — Tue, 19 May 2009 21:57:32 -0000

kei&yuri 2 hours ago
Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's party is drafting legislation to make it a crime to belittle the Soviet ..
and Medvedev and his commission on history.. sure there are tendencies like that to restore soviet communist history cookery, although there is a discussion too. The article of AP looks exaggerated, written By Steve Gutterman and Mansur Mirovalev in Moscow and Maria Danilova in Kiev, Ukraine , names (not) kosher perhaps, but hasn't Russia acknowledged the Katyn massacre on Polish officers (after 1939) as a soviet crime meanwhile? In the worst case Lord Piers was right about the ethnicity of Putin & Madvedev? Then the Nazis will be the only ones telling historic truth. And the present powers China US Russia are as Zions mercenaries afraid of the unseen 3.force? could be so or not,, thinking, to have a positive view, can't change other things anyways and it's possible that history will end one day.

Re: Apologies for Evil

kei&yuri — Tue, 19 May 2009 20:12:04 -0000

Psychopath reacting as all filthy goyim must to the Pavlovian signals of the "Protocols" murders a Jew. Although the writing is very strangely vague and implies he murdered more than one. Anyway, he was (it goes without saying) careful to note down several times that he wanted to kill Jews just like all these people always do.
The article also very mysteriously says that the Jewish community was panicked by the possibility that he was going around killing Jews in general, even though there is no reason to suspect that until later. He killed a girl who might've refused to sleep with him and suddenly this girl's Jewishness was the only criterion in the universe.
In prison he will be medicated and handled safely beyond any hope of finding out what happened. We maintain this garbage comes from the Jewish Mafia, and that far from being community protectors, they will happily kill you to save their own skins, just like every other sort of mafia.

Re: Apologies for Evil

kei&yuri — Tue, 19 May 2009 19:38:25 -0000

Just to clarify for those who don't follow this part of the word, this means that Ukrainians who want to talk about the famines and Baltic peoples who don't appreciate all the wonderful things Moscow did for them are in the eyes of Russian law restarting Nazism.

Re: Apologies for Evil

kei&yuri — Tue, 19 May 2009 19:20:52 -0000

Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's party is drafting legislation to make it a crime to belittle the Soviet contribution to what Russians call the Great Patriotic War. The bill, yet to be submitted to parliament, equates criticizing the Soviets' role with rehabilitating Nazism, and makes it punishable by up to three years in prison.

Well now, where have we heard this before?

Re: Apologies for Evil

lobro — Tue, 19 May 2009 14:13:33 -0000

nazis should sue every time they are compared to zionism (like comparing germans to jews).

Re: Apologies for Evil

Hoarsewhisperer — Tue, 19 May 2009 13:01:16 -0000

Goldberg's NYT Op-Ed was so vacuous, silly, and Pythonesque that I chuckled quietly from beginning to end. Goldberg has succeeded in redefining the terms fact free and juvenile in the propaganda stakes.

I particularly enjoyed this little flight of fancy:

Mr. Netanyahu says he supports Mr. Obama’s plan to engage the Iranians. He also supports the tightening of sanctions on the regime, if engagement doesn’t work. But there should be little doubt that, by the end of this year, if no progress is made, Mr. Netanyahu will seriously consider attacking Iran. His military advisers tell me they believe an attack, even an attack conducted without American help or permission, would have a reasonably high chance of setting back the Iranian program for two to five years.

Couldn't help wondering how many decades Bibi's military advisers told him the response from Iran will set the Israel Project back?
Two?
Three?
Four?
Five?

This was good for more than a chuckle, too:

Mr. Netanyahu, in his first term as prime minister in the late 1990s, earned a reputation for conspicuous insincerity. It is therefore possible to interpret his fixation on Iran — he told me in a recent conversation that it is ruled by a “messianic apocalyptic cult” ...

It doesn't matter which way you slice it and dice it, according to Jeffrey Booboo believes Iran's leaders are indistinguishable from Israel's - unless he was just being conspicuously insincere (aka ironic).

Re: Apologies for Evil

musings — Tue, 19 May 2009 10:20:41 -0000

Okay, so I think I have run down what the motive is for David Ignatius' novel at this time. The problem seems (although he skirts the dual loyalty issue most adroitly) is something to do with good cop-bad cop games with Iran. He likes the place and considers it a theocracy on top of a modern society. He is concerned, with others, such as Leon Panetta, CIA Director, that Israel not bomb Iran. This might of course be inconvenient for US troops in Shia dominated Iraq (who didn't see that coming?). So I see that Ignatius is about to appear in Monterey (an intelligence hub where at the military college there, one prof was canned for doubting Bush on 9/11 and the war in Iraq and GWOT in general - it caused a stir at the time). The forum at which Ignatius is to appear with Gen. Abizaid is the Panetta Insitute, in the Panetta Lecture Series. Same guy as Leon, whose Italian immigrant parents owned a restaurant in Monterey and launched their son through various elite Catholic schools into his present eminence at CIA. Ignatius is an Armenian-American. Retired Gen. Abizaid, successor to Tommy Franks, famously stated that although it would be a good thing to deter Iran's developing a nuke, "We can live with a nuclear Iran. We lived with a nuclear Soviet Union". So what you see is a counter-force to the think tanks of the neocon zionist right, but as I pointed out in my critique of Ignatius' problem in understanding dual loyalty, not so philosophically sound as to be up to the task of dealing with rule by lobby in the US. I can better understand him perhaps, but as we see with Obama, it is hard to struggle out of ill-chosen alliances and into healthier ones. Especially when you cannot name the problems for fear of merciless reprisal, which are career-ending or more lethal. So while engaged in discussions around whether or not Iran is building weapons, it must never be stated that Israel has them, and has them aplenty. Hell, no one is prepared to state that everyone from Pakistan to Israel should disarm. Disarmament, like impeachment, is off the table. Since this is the case, even if Iran is not building nukes, they probably should have them too. If you were an Iranian patriot, you might think that would save you from attack. These three men, Panetta, Ignatius and Abizaid are probably soul-mates, and they want to approach matters as JFK would do. It's funny, I seem to remember a book, Profiles in Courage, about politicians who fell on their swords to achieve some higher principle. But where the Soviet Union and Cuba were concerned, it is "Do as I do, not as I say." So they tiptoe and possibly carry a big stick.

Re: Apologies for Evil

Laurie — Tue, 19 May 2009 09:37:46 -0000

Xymph, time and time again on this blog James A. Gregor's research on what ACTUALLY was the Nazis' racial policy has been brought up. The British op-ed was just that a BRITISH version of what the Nazis thought, NOT a Nazi one.

http://dienekes.awardspace....

Here are the germs of a world-view which makes of man a creator, a builder of future races; a philosophy which unites history, politics and race, eugenics and humanism, pride in self and respect for others, a philosophy scientifically sound and emotionally satisfying. This is the promise of a world-view as yet half-formulated and ill-expressed, with which our time must contend; the Weltanschauung which bears within itself the promise of Nietzsche's Good European.

Bibi's racism is crude and emotional. The Nazis' was logical and nuanced.

I second Xeno, get rid of the reply feature.

Re: Apologies for Evil

Xenophile — Tue, 19 May 2009 09:07:51 -0000

I notice there was no post by Xymph on the Anti-Zionist election list submited by Dieudonné to the European Election. He managed to bring together in his list Alain Soral (nationalist night), the Zohar Centre (muslims), blacks, Green-Party members, traditionalist catholics, and more. This is a major event that is unmasking like never before the zionist-elitist/oligarchic nature of party dictatorship in Western Countries.

This well-referenced text gives a nice summary of what is happening in France. (Atheo has also published it in his site:

Israel lobby commits major blunder in France: tries to silence a comedian
http://vineyardsaker.blogsp...

Re: Apologies for Evil

GregoryBacon — Tue, 19 May 2009 08:05:39 -0000

Most Israeli Jews and ALL of their maniacal leaders are allergic to the "P" word, peace. Anytime someone in the ME mentions that word, Israel usually sends in flights of heavily armed Apache helicopter gunships and smart bomb laden F-16's to negotiate the "peace."

Israel likes to say it is America's only "friend" in the Middle East.

Funny, but I can't but help to think that before Israel came into existence, the U.S. had NO enemies in the Middle East.

And yet, Israel is always proclaiming to be a peaceful nation. The only peace Israel wants is: a "piece" of Jordan; a "piece" of Syria; a "piece" of Lebanon; a "piece" of Egypt; a "piece" of Iraq; a "piece" of Turkey and whatever "pieces" are left after Israel finishes it's genocidal extermination of the Palestinians.